Charlie Chaplin’s Not-So-Silent Paternity Case

Did you know that silent movie actor Charlie Chaplin is linked to the establishment of paternity test results as court-admissible evidence?

In California in 1943, Chaplin faced a paternity suit from ex-girlfriend and fellow actor Joan Berry. Berry claimed that Chaplin was the father of her daughter. Chaplin and Berry’s daughter underwent a blood test that determined that it was biologically impossible for the two to be related. Despite this information, the blood test results were not admissible in court and Chaplin was named the father of the child and ordered to pay child support until her eighteenth birthday. This ruling was based solely on popular opinion rather on scientific evidence (at the time, Chaplin was scrutinized for his political and personal life).

In 1953, California adopted a law to accept blood tests to determine paternity, paving the way for legitimizing today’s DNA test results. The court also overturned its ruling that named Chaplin as the father of Berry’s daughter. Also, since the advent of DNA testing, blood tests have been less frequently used in paternity cases because DNA tests are most often much more accurate and conclusive.

Because of Chaplin’s notoriety, his paternity case drew much attention to the need for conclusive tests for paternity. It also emphasized the need for discretion when facing questions about paternity. Today, DNA test results are commonly accepted in both legal and personal circles as conclusive and definitive answers to questions of paternity and other family relationships. Through in-home testing, you can gain peace of mind by taking a DNA test in the privacy of your own home.

To learn more about Beta’s paternity and other DNA test services, visit our DNA Testing Services page.

Add to:
| Digg it

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.